Monday, July 28, 2008

Denise Richards Accuses Charlie Sheen Of Molesting Their Daughters


Remember when Denise Richards called for an emergency child custody hearing last week? Turns out she falsely accused Charlie Sheen of molesting their two daughters and now Chuck is going to be suing for full custody of the kids by charging that their mother is a big fat lair.

Sources say that Denise was desperate for some good content for her reality show that is doing so poorly in the ratings that E! is most likely not going to renew for another season.

“She thinks a court battle would be good for ratings so she wants all overnight visits with the girls ceased, and monitored visits with her nanny. She invited the media circus to the hearing and even wanted reporters in the judge’s chambers - which wasn’t allowed. It’s ridiculous.”

This recent move has Charlie more furious than ever and plans to sue her in civil court for defamation as well.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

One out of every three-five children will be sexually abused by the age of 18; half by their biological fathers. The statisics are based on scientific evidence in the empirical literature. There is not always physical evidence of molestation for obvious reasons, but often psychological evidence revealed in "acting out" behaviors and a variety of other FORENSIC tests that DO NOT involve leading questions. Unless you are FORENSIC expert, you have no expertise to make any comments about whether or not Denis is a boldfaced liar or Sheen an abuser. There is a myth about protective mothers and parents, that they are somehow coming from a vengeful place. The majority of them are not when you research the empirical literature. Since I am not an expert in this case, it is not for me to say whether or not Sheen abused his daughters; however, the empirical literature and his behaviors in general (e.g., sex addictions, rage, narcissism,, blatantly abusive emails to the mother of his children; etc.) would compel me to scrutizine this case quite closely if I were an expert or judge presiding over the case, especially if the children are exhibiting symptoms that denote sexual abuse (e.g., sexually acting out, post-traumatic-stress-disorder, night-mares, inconsollable tantrums, etc.). Dispel the myth of the "woman scorned" because most mothers are not coming from a vengeful place; although a small percentage are. Further, "inconclusive" or "unsubstantiated" does not mean the abuse did not occur. It simply means there wasn't enough PHYSICAL evidence, such as torn tissue, to hold up in trial to convict the perp. or to mandate supervised visitation. Also, perhaps it isn't Denise that went public with the info., but the Papparazzi. Thus, it matters not what YOU believe despite the fact that the allegation may be "unsubstantiated" or "inconclusive." That does not mean the accusation is FALSE per se. Be careful.